connecting FOR/WITH

The palette of choice, doesn’t only contain colours of paint, to paint pretty pictures with on a 2 dimensional surface.
To create sturdy multidimensional projects, it also contains GLUE, to connect different dimensions (on different levels of being) with..

For building things like bikes, structural integrity is a prime topic.
In such matters, that is referring to the overall material structure being well connected, using suitable-to-its-purpose, high quality materials.

In building communities, the overall structural integrity  of community developments is very much under the influence of the quality of the connections used when various elements within the social constellation are put together in a meaningful order. The ‘glue’ used on connecting it all.

The most natural multidimensional energy-glue one can apply in community building is known as ‘WITH’.

 WITH is strong, flexible, expandable and acts as a high speed, transparent broadband conduit.

However, most people in the western world rely nowadays on using an artificial, two-dimensional (linear) energy-‘glue’ called  ‘FOR’.

FOR may have a stronger ability to keep things firmly in place. However is not so very flexible, can only  expand in one direction (‘more of the same’) once put in place and has much less capacity to act as a conduit. It goes brittle in the long run: loses its shine and liveliness rather quickly and…. the whole construct falls apart at some point in time, often after having  become ‘hard work:  to check all the connections and re-apply FOR constantly, to keep it intact.

People who are connected to human constructs (communities, for instance) held together by relying predominantly on the binding powers of  ‘FOR’ usually describe the cycle of creating and sustaining ‘life’ along these lines:

I have to invest a lot of time in something,

• that I don’t really enjoy doing this way

FOR, ( in order to obtain)

• the things I do value and enjoy doing and having
• like mobility and free time with nourishing activities

Their abundant use and appearance of fixed  and opaque expectations: (have to’s), is a great indicator for using this operating system on MIND. Just as much as the amount of big problems on the screens of their awareness, that keep things/them from moving in the desired direction.
( “No matter how hard you try…..! So, what’s the point in trying?”)

The understandings in communities held together on using ‘ WITH’ are more like:

We invest freely, happily, joyfully the amount of time and energy we have available,

• in the activities we really enjoy doing them this way
• for we know this works most wisely: most smoothly, harmoniously and effectively

WITH,

• the resources we value and enjoy 

Which may seem like only a very subtle difference in approach (which is true) but it produces quite a different  quality of life, as you very well know by your own experiences over the last couple of decades.

The abundant use and appearance of free flowing transparent happy expectancy’s: (like(ly) to’s)  is a great indicator for using this operating system on the MIND.
Just as much as the amount of appealing opportunities they see on the screens of their awareness. Feasible options that keep things moving in the desired direction (forward) , including a clear knowing on why and how. ( “Great results and satisfaction at little cost”)

Can you see how the glue called ‘WITH’ holds a fundamental, sustainable both-and choice?

Joy? Both in the here-and-now and in the future.
Who benefits? Both myself and others involved.

Cultural myth or universal truth

‘Nobody loves a know all’

This phrase is currently quite frequently and usually forcefully used as if it words a Universal Truth, something everybody should be (always) highly aware of in order to make life work well.

I love coming across perceived wisdoms that get regularly used in wide-spread one-liners indicating to be: ' always true, without exceptions'.

I tend not to believe them right away, by the way…. .
I like to chew on such a one-liner for a while, digest it and let it percolate through the filters of my own experiences and filters. How much Universal Truth does it actually contain?

If I can’t see any exceptions, none at all, that means it contains a whole lot of truth….. 

Then, and only then, I will probably consider to use this 'produce' on my palette of choice for a while too.

I usually start with exploding what it could mean?

Playing with the words, it seems to convey a message along these lines:

“ There is not a (significant?) person in this world who relates positively to an entity who expresses (with great self-confidence) all he knows (has observed/learned) to be true.”

Well, if this message was an undeniable Universal Truth, it would explain why we observe  in our western world cultures that:

·        

• Santa Claus (and his Dutch equivalent Sinterklaas) are among the most unpopular creatures on this planet. (Let’s face it, who wants the quality of their presents to depend on a know all: ‘They know if you’ve been naughty or nice!’)
  
• when somebody is ill, he prefers to go see a doctor who clearly is clueless about this illness, and/or on providing human healthcare.
  
• teachers give the highest praise to those students who simply shrug and hand in empty papers. Teachers' pain lies in having to work so hard to try and motivate the students who answer their questions according to their mutual highest understanding, to be more like the shruggers. They give these ‘know alls’  the lowest grades and when they persevere in this abhorrent behaviour, sometimes simply have to send them away.
  
• society generally assigns the function of ‘judge’ to people who are clueless about the values underneath The Law, people who have the least affinity with the highest human moral standards.
  
• nobody is interested in pairing up on quiz-nights with somebody who has easily access to all sorts of facts and figures in general knowledge.
  
• everybody always sings the songs they like from paper, because showing to know all the lyrics completely by heart would mean the end of your social life.
  
• never, ever, in social gatherings exchange people endless streams of details on the movies and things on television they watched. Such ‘know all’ behaviour is socially frowned upon.
  
• no person in the world has the slightest interest in spirituality or religion, because all religions picture this Divine-creature (whatever his name might be, depending on the name of the religion) to be a know all.
  
• Every single person in this world hates the internet. All that is known to man gets mentioned on this hateful thing. So, no person in his right mind spends any time consulting it, because that would mean loving it: relating positively to an entity that very confidently ‘knows all’ and shares it's knowledge whenever you send out a request.

I think, this very short list of how-it-really-isn’ts, is giving enough obvious evidence that there are human beings alive who do ‘love’ (positively relate to, spend time with, honour, respect and enjoy) intelligence being actively used.

Because to me, that is the core of what this message is about.

It seems to convey the message:

“ There is not a person in this world who relates positively to somebody who uses (with great self-confidence) his intelligence: his (or hers, of course) capacities for applying his knowing.”

This is fascinating, in the light of what I wrote recently on website about freedom, choices and leadership in humanity: http://being-one.weebly.com

I wrote: “We all have access to the Knowing of man, because together we form the Knowing (of) man (homo sapiens means the knowing man)

Which would lead to thinking:

“ If you are actively believing this ‘nobody loves a know all’  to be a Universal Truth, that it is actually (always!) necessary for your survival to limit your capacities for applying your knowing…... then.......you are not loving being human yourself.”

Not loving yourself, not loving being fully alive……not loving comparing what you know and perceive with what other human beings know and perceive…not loving the knowing as the dynamic ever evolving grid of shared experiences…..Hum, well..........

So why is this one-liner so much used, with the force behind it of being a social truth on a life and death matter?

Try answering this question, having established that there are many situations when having access to all there is to know is a really good , preferable, enjoyable, humane and social thing.

Who does love the know-all who is fully applying his talents for truth finding when that is a judge who can and does tap into all there is to know, both in the seen, (what is said and done)  and the unseen (unsaid and not done) assessing a situation:

·         Is it the person who knows himself to be completely non-involved in the crime he is framed for by someone, or

·         Is it the person who knows himself to be the perpetrator

The person who thinks (fully well knows) his freedom and kind/social image is at stake when the full truth about his own real intentions, whereabouts and actions is known, is more likely to resent ‘all ( full) knowing’ with a passion.

Now it would be too easy to call this a personal strategy, of a few 'bad' people who have to hide severe wrong-doings.

We do, after all, collectively believe that this ‘nobody loves a know all’ holds quite some life-and-death truth… otherwise we wouldn’t be using it so frequently and forcefully. 

Otherwise it wouldn’t be one of the collective messages that makes so many talented, 'higly aware, highly sensitive' (HSP) and/or 'extra intelligent' people decide to stop or reduce being their knowing.

This sentence only impacts us when it is held (forcefully) before us by somebody we do depend quite highly on for our survival and sense of wellbeing.

Why?

We are fully aware of the severe warning transmitted in energy vibes:” Hold your knowing regarding this situation to yourself, or else… you’ll lose being related to positively ….by me.”

No child in the world can risk that his prime caretakers withdraws fully from them. It knows that that  will mean death. Social death, of not being loved ( your experience respected, your needs honoured, being given attention and opportunities to play with your unique talents) is maybe worse than being physically dead.

So, no child in the world can risk not to relate positively to his prime caretakers!

That means that the real truth, the message conveyed in energy-vibes would sound more like this:

”He, you! What the f**k! I don’t want you to express what you know to be true about me, because when certain details of that will be widely known, I know that to lead to severe, undesirable consequences for me on how people see me and relate to me, my likeability and personal freedom. So, shut up, NOW, will you!?”

Has to be interpreted as the message:

”You are not loveable when you express openly and honestly your highest truths, apply your knowing!”

Which is such a harsh untruth against what we know on soul level, that it has to be translated into:

'Being a human being alive right now, apparently doesn't mix very well with being the knowing"

How much more encouragement do you need to shelve your own highest truths, your own talents, the things you clearly experience as a fully functioning human being, having this access to knowing of what-is-so, at any given time…..? Especcially if this message gets repeated over and over again?

So in order to be lovable (in the eyes of others we depend on) , we learn, we have to stay away as much as we can from applying all our knowing.

And when somebody openly wonders how what you say, aligns with what you actually do (and the vibes you are transmitting about it), seeing how you don't seem to choose to apply your own knowing, much……Your last resort is to pass on this message, forcecully, that is so accepted, almost as 'good advice' all over the world as really true about human life:

" Nobody loves a know all!"

It looks to be so true, because we collectively believe it.
We believe it for it was once the life threatening warning we had to respond to by shutting ourselves up in order to (socially and physically) survive. (Limit our own freedom.)
And in hanging on to believing it, way past its expiry date (childhood), we are (collectively) not alive as fully functioning human beings ( the knowing man), but only surviving as frightened-for-our-existence-children, desperate to avoid applying openly our own inner highest knowing. 

Passing on the very same abuse ( because that is what it is in plain terms, sorry if that word is difficult for you to accept) to our ‘loved ones’, in our adulthood.

Hiding our true selves, actively and deliberately hiding relevant information, especially from the people in our here-and-now company.....

That, to me, is not applying the knowing. That, to me, is not being the knowing.

It is not anywhere near close to my highest understanding of this spiritual concept of being ‘love’, or the down to earth understandings of ‘being a kind human being’.

I observe... the degree to which you live from this modus operandi, relates direclty to the degree you are happy with yourself and are happy with being in your here-and-now reality.

If these understandings make me a ‘nobody’ in the eyes of the current cultural collective mind, than fine.

I know that I enjoy being a human being who applies her talents, her highest understanding, fearless, to her best abilities. Despite what some people like to think when they don't like what I convey what I know and experience... that includes, with a sensibility to old wounds and cultural myths, wijth an intention support the healing and mutual understanding.
It doesn’t include anymore…. not believing my own experiences of all-that-is.
It does include the question: "how does all I know, relate to other information?"

Knowing that all-I-know…… expands and grows, transform and is a dynamic ever changing occurance.

If that sounds very much like ‘life itself’ …..  to me that rings quite true.

either majority.... or... minority?

Invitation to play to the CWG community

Implementing our highest understandings on governing ourselves

In the book 'Conversations With God, The Uncommon Dialogue, part III',  Neale Donald Walsch wonders in chapter 16:" What (else) marks a society as either ‘primitive’ or ‘advanced’?"

The answer is short and sweet: ‘ The degree to which it implements its own highest understandings’.

In the same paragraph, this statement gets followed by this meaningful  question:” What good are the highest understandings if you do not implement them?”

My name is Esther Dageraad.
I am an international advisor in sustainable community developments and I work from a paradigm of oneness.
I choose to invite the people who are attracted by the idea of applying the insights from Conversations with God in their everyday life, to have a close look at the highest understandings going, on: leadership and decision making processes within communities.

democracy

There are democratic elections being organised in one of the nations with the most impact on the use of all kinds of resources on our planet, the USA is in the process of choosing a new president.

I think it is fair to say, we ( modern Western World people) consider ‘democracy’ a reflection of our highest understandings on governing ourselves. It reflects the core choice to allow the majority in a group to make important decisions for the whole, like choosing community-leaders. “Who represents best our personal values and ideas on how to support the quality of life?”

Anyone who observes the actual behaviour of our species for a while, can notice how we say that we believe we are making important decisions by executing what the majority of the people involved in a matter consider to be the best approach.

Meanwhile, however, it is also quite clear that on all levels, from intra-personal, to inter-personal, inter-national, inter-est and inter(-n)-al, we do quite the opposite, every single day. 

So we say we desire to go to Seattle, meanwhile heading day in day out towards San Jose…. (reference to content of the book)

The road to San Jose is in this case, being ‘OK’ with letting a small minority make important decisions on, for instance, how the life-sustaining resources we have access to are used and cared for.

minority/majority?
These are the observations on those levels:

intra-personal  (in one’s inner world):

We put our conscious mind functions in charge of our choices, Which is indeed the majority of what we are most easily consciously aware of.
However, seen from our total mind capacity, our conscious mind functions form only approximately 20% of all functions being minded..... .
About 80% of the life sustaining processes within a person takes place subconsciously, far below the thresholds of our awareness. (Think for example: digestion of food and information, cell-regeneration, waste-management… to name a few functions the conscious mind is hardly actively involved in)

inter-personal (between two or more individuals):

We put the flow of 'matter' in charge of our time-investment decisions. We see material values (stuff, among which money ranks on number one) as most influential on our levels of interpersonal prosperity and wellbeing. As if we are thinking: " what really matters in our communities is what you can count". However, we are (at least semi-) aware that the things you can count and weigh (matter) make up only a fraction of the whole flow of what is playing a part in being well, in this Universe.
The majority of 'things' that really, really matter to satisfying levels of richness and wellbeing is the invisible flow of 'what you can really count on' in life: the immaterial flow of the treasures of a good life. For instance: trust, faith, belief, support, care, comfort, sharing knowledge, cooperation, kind intentions....... 

inter-national (between two or more countries)

Roughly 250 million voters on a population of roughly 320 million, sounds like a majority.Roughly 250 million voters on a population of roughly 7 billion, is very much a minority.

inter-est (the relations between 'what is')

Does 7 billion of very influential people alive today sound like a whole lot of beings alive?

Human beings are only a tiny minority, in numbers, of all beings alive on this Earth, ​who's lives we impact a great deal with our day to day decisions.

Well, going to San Jose might be a beautiful journey too, with a lot of fun and interesting debates along the way, bringing forward the experiences we chose in order to evolve and advance, both personally and as a species…..?
HEB’s* litmus test: Do those governing systems work well?
Is prosperity and wellbeing indeed thriving, for all involved?

I suspect there is hardly anyone in this world who would answer these questions wholeheartedly with:” O yes! I observe that we are all doing really really well!”.
And if there is, I am pretty sure (s)he isn’t voicing the majority’s experiences.

So…can we come up with something that works better, for all involved?

“Yes we can….!” Or am I on the wrong election round here ;-)

Where is the next meta-physical roundabout where we can choose to take the road to meta-physical ‘Seattle’?

This idea, this text, this invitation to play with the content of this website, may very well be such a meta-physical roundabout.

I figure that this big election, might be a very good opportunity to really look deeply at our decision making and self-governing processes and move into another direction with it.
Developing ourselves in a direction that honours, joyfully and freely the (natural, spiritual) human constitution, reclaiming peacefully our human co-creative choices-rights as a tribe member in the tribe of mankind.
Implementing our highest understandings......
if you like making either or choices....... either oneness..... or... democracy.

I know, that is the same exit on this meta-physical roundabout, which makes it a both/and choice, here.

In co-creation with the source of life, I designed invitations to play with this oneness-paradigm, in the light of choices revolving around leadership and I made them available through this website: http://being-one.weebly.com/
Showing those who are curious about it, very practical possibilities on implementing your highest understandings in what you perceive to be your community.

Honouring your freedom of choice, holding the be-do-have paradigm**, the way it usually does work wonders, for all involved.

Enjoy!

* HEB's is a reference to the content of the book to, meaning Highly Evolved Beings

**the be-do have paradigm is also a reference to content of the book

either a job or joy of being.....?

So often, I meet people who can't reconsile what their 'soul' wants, with the jobs and roles they play in every day live.

If the souls happens to want ' freedom'..... to experience expressing yourself to your highest (moral) values, not only in words but also in matching actions... for instance, so many people think that it is difficult to combine that with being a parent or partner and impossible with being a worker (or working in a 'normal' job):

• because you are in a certain unequal position of dependancy,
• that comes with certain 'have to's'
• for your life sustenance (often among adults simplified to 'money')

So, they figure something along the lines of... "Unless I have/win/inherit a lot of money, that buys me this freedom to be independant of every such job/role, I'd better limit and restrict the desires of my soul, than jeopardising my sense of safety and security.....

Granted, with this strategy you may not physically 'die' any day soon, but emotionally you are rapidly decreasing feeling alive and you are losing track at high speed of seeing enough (appealing) possibilites to sustain your aliveness.

Back to the drawing board, using the palette of choice........

How could it be possible to apply both.... and... - thinking here?
Expanding your sense of freedom and aliveness within the context of fullfilling certain roles in your community that are under the influence of limiting regulations?

Well..... it could be possible by redifining your job(s).
A suggestion for that is found on this website.

Perspective

On the human palette of choice, you've got choice which perspective you choose to look at occurrences in life.

As so often on this blog, feeling you have to choose between either….(this perspective) or…. that perspective, produces very different results from being able to use multiple views at the same time of an occurrence.

Try to imagine the differences in results (of perception) of these approaches:

• Looking a single occurrence , without regards to the context this occurrence ‘pops up’ in.
  (either…. occurrence…. or .....context)
  
• Looking at an occurrence seeing it being part of a recurring pattern, in it’s actual context.
  (both…occurrence and ….context)

Now imagine the difference in understanding of an occurrence playing with the number of ‘eye’s’ you view it with.

• Looking at an occurrence from just one perspective.
  (either…… or…..)
  
• Looking at an occurrence from several perspectives, either simultaneously or quickly alternating.
  (both…. and…..)

Many modern day people tend to prefer looking at things from (just) one perspective.

Whether that is ‘ their own perspective’ (that of your own personal belief system’s point of view), or ‘ what will the neighbours think’, or ‘ what do you think’… does not really matter.

Looking with one eye at the world, whichever eye, is likely to trip you over at some point in time when you start moving around in it….
You don’t see enough depth to assess what you position is or what an occurence is.
You’ll have a 2D vision (flat) and are missing important information to interact properly with what is occuring in your world.

Looking with two eyes simultaneously gives 3D vision.

That is much more practical when you are moving though the world, you'll see potential trip hazards for what they are and are able to step over it with grace ans ease.

Try looking at life with at least three eyes and you’ll have 4D vision.

Three eyes...huh?.... I only have got two!!?

1. My own perspective, where I am now
   
2. The other(s) involved, what can they see in this context
   
3. A person looking at the whole situation from an (emotional) distance

Increase you ability to open as many eyes as you have to the world and you'll hit a lot less of life's 'trip hazards', is my experience.
Not only hurting your self on s hort term  (hitting on something you call 'bad' with your own perception influences your mood quite a bit), but also hurting your self a lot less in the long run.
Completely ignoring the other perspectives ( and underlying needs) makes your stumbling blocks in life only bigger.

You may think that that is somebody else's fold, putting those 'bad things', the things you don't like in itself or their consequences on your path.

Bad person for limiting my freedom! 

How dare they (all of a sudden) do that to me !

Without my consent! 

They should feel ashamed of themselves, very very ashamed! 

How can they treat me sooooo badly!?

But he.......walking though life using only one eye, while you have at least two properly working eyes available and then bumping into things and tripping over them, not paying enough attention.....who is causing these ' bad things' to happen then...really?

Before you come to a conclusion like the above Italic ( and surely before your express it to others who 'did this horrible thing to you' ), you may want to consider checking if you have properly looked at the situation, with context, also from their perspectives (and likely intentions) looking at your patterns and the occurances you've put on their paths. 

Not to identify who should be ashamed of what..... 

Simply to open up your palette of choice using all available colours, seeing the 4D reality you are moving about in, adding onto, to identify what would be a meaningful next step to take, happily, confidently.

milk: a carrier for community information?

On my palette, a couple of elements got mixed and showed an option I found intriguing to apply at least on this blog-canvas of life.

The main elements I recognised in the mix:

• My understandings on vibrational essences and how they relay messages a human being can interpret in pure energy
• My recent discoveries reading on the Female brain, more specifically, the Mommy brain
• A desire to be able to improve the quality of communal life with almost no cost, little effort, using the already (freely) available natural resources.

As often, it would go to far within the context of this blog post to try to explain all the background in depth, since it contains at least decades of looking at my life experiences with a special interest in human interactions and how various streams of information can be meaningfully used.

Based on the prime observation that the overall state of how we interact with each other in the tribe of mankind, leaves quite some room for improvement.

Yeah..... quite an understatement….. and…..narrowing it down somewhat.
This is before I  delve into how human beings interact in general with other living beings on this planet.....

I suddenly found myself wondering,  yesterday afternoon : "What if the milk a mother produces for her child, contains… apart from biological components also….. information about the developments in the community they are a part of?”

Pulling this idea a little closed to the puddle of knowledge on vibrational  essences with my mental brush:

• What if the mother’s personal resonance creates in the fluids of the milk a vibrational essence?
• What if that gives the child a great deal of energetical input, based on the mother's observations on both the developments of the community as well as the developments of her child?

I could mix that easily with a blob of the insights conveyed by Louann Brizindine in the Female Brain.
Not only are women ‘hard wired’, as she calls it, to have fine-tuned sensitive antennas for what is going on on the subtle levels of all the relations she is involved in and an ability to influence the processes in subtle ways……
When a woman is a mother, she has developed a Mummy Brain, where the wellbeing of the child gets super-priority. So the antennas to tune into all the child’s needs to support a healthy development are extra alert. Since a well functioning, caring for all its members, community increases the chances for this child to grow up in a healthy way ( in case anything happens to mum, for instance) both mother and child have an invested interest in healthy sustainable developments in the community.

I was then wondering, extrapolating a little:

• What if, part of what these regularly updated news bulletins also contain, is information on the existential theme on ‘how to be a caring nurturing human being that is able to provide exactly what is needed in a natural way, using natural resources to help the wellbeing and healthy growth of the members of this community develop’.

Why would this be part of the mix?
Well….. it is what the mother is being, is expressing to her best natural ability.
It could very well be the core of her resonance, especially when she is nursing her child, actively producing the product from her own body, that feeds the baby.. who embodies the ‘ future’ of the community.

Then….. if there is merit to this being part of the natural stream of information…. I wondered on the darker side of the palette:

Hmmm, so if more and more children are not being breastfed ( observation), already for many generations, are large contingents of people missing out on this existential  input on what it means to be a human being?
Would ‘not having had that message repeated to you, while experiencing (over and over again) how a member of the tribe was actually catering tailormade her (natural) produce ( freely, willingly and for free) to your very needs’….. begin to explain why the concept of sharing, caring and using natural resources wisely for yourself and others would seem to alien to so many of us?

Knowing that babies do get some formula to drink, to grow on, providing them the biological nutrients…. I even wondered…..

Hmmm…. If that formula is created from cows-milk……if there is still any energetical messages in it on an existential level….what could that be:

• I am a herd animal….. I have to follow the herd, my safety lies in doing what the others do?

And, if a Mommy Brain is also present in the Mummy Cow ( and why not) would it relay various messages on the current state of affairs in the community of the cows world:

• All children are being taken away from us. I am not allowed to care for my offspring or the members of my community myself, my (natural) way! 
• (deep grief about the structural injustice of ‘life’… if you have ever heard the cows when they take the calf’s away)
• I exist to support what is not my tribe, the people who do not deeply care for my wellbeing, are not providing me with all I need to thrive.

I don’t know, this me be my empathic imagination working at high speed, but if such  messages were conveyed in energy through all the milk products we use, both as children and as adults…. and the core of our being would be naturally still picking up on those messages as the highest available current truth about our life…… it may be blunt, but…. to my mind it would explain a lot about the current state of affairs in the world of human interactions.

We ‘ follow the herd’, exist to support the ‘tribe’ that is feeding us (money/status) , on the expense of given proper care and attention to the people in our close relationships.
Trying to fit a herd-animals take on the world into a human being existence ( yes, a social being, but no, not a herd animal) may influence the palette of choice in a way that steps away from the unique human characteristics and traits…….

So.. what if there was a fair amount of merit and truth in all this… I wondered would this insight hold a clue for improvement?

He, it is easy to look at it from a doom and gloom angle:” We’ve messed with nature and our natural Food for Thought for a long while now. Whoops. Sorry, try again next planet. Game over.”

But he, it ain’t over till the fat lady sings!

• What if, this very dynamical vibrational essence of nursing mothers, could be the natural resource to turn to help the community of mankind to climb out of this disconnected state!

Using the knowledge on how vibrational essences are created and distributed, I know you only need a very small quantity of the mother-tincture ( ha, ha, how appropriate that this is already called mother-tincture!) to make an enormous batch of daughter-stock and from that dosage bottles.

• What if, when used wisely, this vibrational essence could be more than only a ‘ static’ one, reminding people of sharing and a collective consciousness … using the ‘ core’ resonance of that.
• What if, it could also be a dynamic essence!

If the milk is freely, willingly and with full attention for this purpose also donated to the community this nursing mother  is a member of herself, she will relay daily updated valuable information from a highly attuned to the collective consciousness Mummy Brain all there is to know about the current developments in their community.

All that takes is some clever efficient organisation, so she can supply a small quantity… as if it were a life-yoghurt starter.. to a large container of fresh spring water, where the community members who choose to, can tap from to drink supply themselves with the wisdom within the this human tribe.

(yes, the wise use would also involve making sure the mother is not only freely willing and motivated, but also healthy. HIV for instance seems to be able to travel through breast milk, it being a bodily fluid. )

Using eons of Mummy Brain experiences, tapped into by a human being who is a mother right now who is already hard wired to pick up on what is going on on the unseen levels of relations, being able to provide subtle influences to increase the quality of it……. sounds like a wonderful source of wise resonances on the actual communal tides to me.

Yes, this while idea  would need research. It would need research that looks beyond the biological components, straight into what is relayed in pure energy -in-formation.
Yes, there would be a number of squirms that needs looking into.
Yes, the dairy industry may not be best pleased with his blog post for believing it and acting widely upon it may ruin their trade and well maintained reputation of providing healthy products.

But, on the bright side of all that: if mankind goes on interacting with each other and other living beings the way it does now, using the current ethical and moral standards, economical motives and health &  safety understandings……  the trade and high held reputations of all of us may seize to exist anyway ;-)
So, trying to protect and stick to that, may not be what serves/safes ‘us’  in the long run.

There is a lot of ‘what ifs’ in this blog post. 
I don’t ‘ know’ for sure!
It hasn’t been tried yet, nor thought about much in this light. I just ' made it up' on my palette of choice, only yesterday!

So yes, feel free to wonder:” What if this is just all rubbish, mixing things that have absolutely nothing to do with each other, no obvious correlation what so ever!”

I suspect, the more interesting question if you endeavour to open up your palette of choice would be to ask yourself here :

“ What if there is merit to this line of thought?” … and….“ How can I combine this idea what I know from my experience?”

That is to say: without running away from it or needing tofight it.

mind: mine

I was going through the produce in my Food for Though storage space ( the hard disk on my computer).
I found another jar with 'pickled' ideas that had been sitting there, ripening in the unseen.

This one....? I actually forgot about making it! But remembered I did it about a year and a half ago.

I think this playful home made pruduct goes very well with many dishes related to freedom of choice.

So help yourself to a spoonful of playful inspiration for the mind by going to the online shelve I created for it here.